The double tax liability may also affect U.S. citizens and residents who work for foreign subsidiaries of U.S. companies. This is likely to be the case if a U.S. company has followed the usual practice of entering into an agreement with the Treasury Department under Section 3121(l) of the Internal Revenue Code to provide social security coverage to U.S. citizens and residents employed by the subsidiary. In addition, U.S. citizens and self-employed residents outside the U.S. are often subject to a double Social Security tax liability because they continue to be covered by the U.S.
program even if they do not do business in the United States. 12 In the meantime, the United States had also concluded an agreement with the Federal Republic of Germany, which was also in a legal vacuum until the adoption of the 1977 amendments. Employers should consult the coverage certificates to find out how to request the necessary documents to avoid social security taxes in a foreign country under an agreement. These international social security agreements are called «tabulation agreements» and have two main purposes: people generally do not have to take action regarding aggregation benefits under an agreement until they are willing to apply for retirement, survivor or disability benefits. A person who wishes to claim benefits under a tabulation agreement can do so at any Social Security office in the United States or abroad. The enabling legislation contained in the 1977 amendments is Section 233 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 433), 13, which allows the President to conclude bilateral tabulation agreements with countries that have a social security system similar to that of the United States. Section 233 establishes tabulation agreements as executive agreements of Congress that have essentially the same legislative force as treaties, but do not require full ratification by the Senate. For an agreement to enter into force, the president must submit it to Congress, where he must rest for 60 days before the two chambers where one or both chambers meet; This period must pass without either chamber having adopted a resolution of disapproval.
In the absence of a totalization agreement, many workers who are temporarily employed or self-employed in another country – as well as employers in the former – face the onerous prospect of paying social security taxes to two countries with the same income. For example, a U.S. employer may send a U.S. employee to another country to continue their employment. Unless a tabulation agreement is in place, both the employer and employee are generally required to pay social security taxes in the United States and the host country on the employee`s income. Similarly, when a foreign employer sends an employee to the United States to pursue their employment, both the employer and the employee often have to pay double the Social Security taxes, unless that country and the United States have a tabulation agreement in place. Although tabulation agreements vary depending on the social security system of the partner country, Table A-1 summarizes some common coverage situations for U.S. workers posted abroad to work. In general, an employee is covered by the social security system of the country in which he works. However, the tabulation agreements provide exceptions for certain categories of U.S. workers.
Since tabulation agreements are reciprocal in nature, these exceptions apply equally to foreign workers in the United States. Provisions to abolish double coverage for workers are similar in all U.S. agreements. Each establishes a ground rule based on an employee`s workplace. Under this basic «territoriality rule,» an employee who would otherwise be covered by both the United States and a foreign system is subject exclusively to the coverage laws of the country in which he or she works. In 2019, the United States and the French Republic, through diplomatic communications, recalled an agreement according to which the French taxes of the Generalized Social Contribution (CSG) and the Contribution to the Repayment of the Sociate Debt (CRDS) are not social taxes covered by the Social Security Agreement between the two countries. Accordingly, the IRS will not challenge the foreign tax credits for CSG and CRDS payments on the grounds that the Social Security Convention applies to these taxes. A common misconception about the U.S. agreements is that they allow dual-insurance workers or their employers to choose the system they will contribute to.
This is not the case. In addition, the agreements do not change the basic coverage provisions of the social security laws of the participating countries – such as those that define income or work covered. They simply exempt workers from coverage by the system of one country or another if their work would otherwise fall under both regimes. Aggregation agreements protect the benefit rights of workers who share their careers between the two countries by allowing each country to count periods of social security acquired in the other country if necessary to establish entitlement to benefits. .
L | M | X | J | V | S | D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
© 2015 Instituto Superior de Educación Física | Diseño web: ORSON MEDIA